Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42529377›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026

Microbial remediation of recalcitrant pollutants in soil and geo-environmental engineering systems.

Anjana S, A K Priya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anjana SDivision of Civil Engineering, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
A K PriyaDivision of Biotechnology, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated compounds, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and heavy metals are all examples of pollutants that are more difficult to degrade in the environment, are toxic, and persist in the environment for an extended period. Traditional remediation practices are often high-cost, high energy, and can have a negative impact on soil ecosystems. Microbial remediation has proven to be an emerging sustainable and eco-friendly technology using bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes, and microbial consortia to degrade, transform, immobilize, and/or detoxify contaminants through a variety of processes such as biodegradation, biosorption, bioaccumulation, biotransformation, biomineralization, co-metabolism, and biofilm-mediated processes. This review covers the types of pollutants that are recalcitrant, the microbial communities in the soil, and the most significant microbial processes associated with the remediation of recalcitrant pollutants. Additionally, the most important applications of geo-environmental engineering (GE) are critically discussed, including biostimulation, bioaugmentation, rhizoremediation, mycoremediation, microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP), and permeable reactive biobarriers. The factors affecting remediation effectiveness, advanced monitoring methods, existing challenges, and emerging innovations such as synthetic biology, engineered microbial consortia, nanobioremediation, and artificial intelligence are also pointed out. Microbial processes combined with geo-environmental engineering can be a promising way to restore the soil sustainably and to protect the environment for the long term.

Indexed as

biodegradationgeo-environmental engineeringheavy metalsMICPmicrobial consortiamicrobial remediationrecalcitrant pollutantssoil contamination

Identifiers

PMID42529377
PMCPMC13416857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.