ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
AI anxiety and AI dependence among undergraduates: a moderated mediation model of AI self-efficacy and AI literacy.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Literacy and the Responsible Use of Generative AI Among University Students in Peru: The Mediating Role of Self-Regulated Learning and the Moderating Effect of Technostress.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026Article
- Multidimensional perceived school support and AI learning anxiety among university students: the mediating roles of control-value appraisals.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education offers transformative learning potential but has concurrently triggered psychological challenges, specifically AI anxiety and AI dependence. While these phenomena are increasingly prevalent, the psychological mechanisms converting affective strain into behavioral reliance remain underexplored. Grounded in Cognitive Behavioral Theory and Conservation of Resources Theory, this study investigates the relationship between AI anxiety and AI dependence among undergraduates. Specifically, it examines whether AI self-efficacy mediates this relationship and whether AI literacy acts as a boundary condition moderating these pathways. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 400 undergraduates recruited via stratified sampling from a normal university in Southwest China. Participants completed validated scales measuring AI anxiety, AI self-efficacy, AI literacy, and AI dependence. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to verify instrument validity. Hypotheses were tested using the PROCESS macro (Models 4 and 8) to analyze mediation and moderated mediation effects, utilizing bootstrapping techniques with 5,000 resamples to determine the statistical significance of direct and indirect effects. Results: The analysis revealed a significant positive association between AI anxiety and AI dependence. AI self-efficacy was found to partially mediate this relationship, indicating that anxiety exacerbates dependence by eroding students' confidence in their capabilities. Furthermore, AI literacy served as a significant moderator. Results indicated that the negative impact of AI anxiety on AI self-efficacy was stronger for students with higher AI literacy, suggesting that high literacy may sensitize students to competency gaps under emotional strain. AI literacy did not moderate the direct relationship between anxiety and dependence. Conclusion: This study identifies AI dependence as a maladaptive coping response to AI anxiety, driven by diminished AI self-efficacy. The findings challenge the assumption that literacy acts solely as a protective buffer, revealing that without emotional regulation, high literacy may intensify the erosion of self- confidence during anxious states. To mitigate maladaptive dependence, higher education institutions should move beyond technical training to adopt holistic strategies. These should include psychological support to build resilience, mastery experiences to foster self-efficacy, and comprehensive curricula that address the emotional and cognitive dimensions of human-AI interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.