Trial reportFrontiers in neurology
A mechanical rotation chair provides superior diagnostics of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo amongst elderly.
Trial report in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04147156 (Efficacy of a New Type of Mechanical Rotational Chair), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of a New Type of Mechanical Rotational Chair (ROTUNDUM) in Treating BPPV
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV) is the most common cause of vertigo and occurs frequently among elderly individuals, who are at increased risk of falls, impaired mobility, and reduced quality of life. Traditional bedside (TB) diagnostics rely on accurate patient positioning and cooperation, which may be challenging in older populations. Mechanical rotation chairs (MRCs) have been introduced to improve diagnostic precision, but evidence regarding their superiority in elderly patients remains limited. Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of BPPV between MRC- and TB diagnostics in an elderly population. Methods: Prospective, randomized crossover study with 201 participants aged 60 years or above. Participants underwent both TB- and MRC diagnostics with bilateral Dix-Hallpike- and Supine Roll Tests. The order of diagnostic modality was randomized. Agreement between modalities was assessed using percentage agreement and Cohen's kappa. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of TB diagnostics were calculated using MRC diagnostics as the reference standard. Secondary analyses examined diagnostic performance in posterior versus non-posterior BPPV and the effect of reduced patient cooperation. Tertiary analyses examined optimal positioning with MRC Supine Roll Testing. Results: BPPV was diagnosed in 61 participants (30.3%) with TB diagnostics and 68 participants (33.8%) with MRC diagnostics. Overall agreement between modalities was 89.6% with a Cohen's kappa of 0.76, indicating substantial to near-perfect agreement. Compared with MRC diagnostics, TB diagnostics demonstrated a sensitivity of 79%, specificity of 95%, PPV of 89%, and NPV of 90%. Sensitivity for non-posterior BPPV was lower (63%). Diagnostic performance declined in participants with impaired cooperation, where sensitivity decreased to 60%. MRC diagnostics identified more non-posterior and cupulolithiasis cases than TB diagnostics. A 60-degree backward Supine Roll Test position showed higher detection rates of lateral BPPV than a 90-degree position, although differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: MRC diagnostics provide superior diagnostic sensitivity for BPPV in elderly patients, particularly for non-posterior subtypes and in cases with limited patient cooperation. TB diagnostics remain an effective first-line diagnostic tool. However, MRC diagnostics should be considered when bedside findings are inconclusive or when complex BPPV is suspected. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04147156.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.