ReviewJACS Au2026
The Nickel Age in Electrocatalytic Anodic Reactions.
Review in JACS Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last three decades, the superior performance of Ni-based electrocatalysts over other transition-metal (TM)-derived materials has been established for different anodic reactions, such as the oxygen evolution reaction (OER), organic oxidation, biomass valorization, plastic reforming, small molecule activation, etc. In the alkaline electrolyte, Ni-based catalysts are transformed into different active crystal phases of Ni-(O)-OH (β, γ, or their mixture) with a wide variation in the local geometry of Ni (octahedral, square pyramidal, square planar, etc.), coordination environment, oxidation state (+2, + 3, and +4), spin state, and Ni-O bond length. The dynamic redox behavior of Ni ions in different reactions has been found to be crucial for OER and other anodic oxidation processes. Therefore, designing efficient Ni-based electrocatalysts for anodic oxidation reactions requires a comprehensive understanding of their structure-activity relationships and underlying reaction mechanisms. In this perspective, the mechanistic aspects of different anodic reactions with Ni-based catalysts have been described with the help of in situ and ex situ spectroscopic, microscopic, and analytical techniques. Further, theoretical calculations have been introduced for a clearer understanding of the structure-activity relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.