ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2026
Biomarker Testing Among Patients With Nonsquamous NSCLC Across Three Time Periods and Three Testing Platforms-A Brief Report.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomarker testing in stage III/IV nonsquamous NSCLC is critical in treatment decision-making. This ambispective review included 1028 patients across three time periods to evaluate the clinical impact of evolving genomic testing platforms. Cohort 1 (C1: 2015-2017) had reflex EGFR/ALK testing. Cohort 2 (C2: 2017-2020) used limited next-generation sequencing (NGS; 15 genes), ALK, and ROS1 testing. Cohort 3 (C3: 2020-2022) used comprehensive NGS (161 genes). Larger NGS panels identified more actionable genomic alterations, but increased biopsy-to-result turnaround times and fewer patients had complete molecular results at first medical oncology consultation leading to delays in treatment initiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.