SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Drug interventions for acute treatment of pediatric migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Migraine in children and adolescents not only impacts academic pursuits and family life but also have secondary psychological effects. Determining the role of acute medication for migraine treatment in this population can reduce the burden associated with migraine. This network meta-analysis aimed to identify the relative efficacy and safety of acute migraine drug in children and adolescents migraine populations. Methods: The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and MEDLINE via PubMed and Embase databases were searched from inception to August 2025, only published studies in English. Double-blind randomized clinical trials evaluating the currently available acute treatments for childhood and adolescent migraines were included. The primary efficacy endpoint was pain freedom at 2 hours. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the proportion of participants with pain relief at 2 hours, pain freedom from two to 24 h, and the proportion using rescue drugs after 2 hours and up to 24 h. Adverse events (AEs) were also evaluated. Results: The analysis included 30 studies (involving 8,914 participants and 13 pharmacological interventions). All treatments included demonstrated higher odds ratios (ORs) compared with the placebo for pain freedom at 2 hours. Dihydroergotamine was associated with the highest ORs, but its confidence interval included null values. Sumatriptan/naproxen sodium, ibuprofen, zolmitriptan nasal spray, sumatriptan nasal spray, and rizatriptan showed statistical significance. Sumatriptan/naproxen sodium yielded the highest odds (OR: 2.91, 95% CI: 1.87-4.53), followed by ibuprofen (OR: 2.88, 95% CI: 1.47-5.64), and rizatriptan showed the lowest (OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.23-1.86). Only sumatriptan/naproxen sodium was associated with a significantly higher OR compared with placebo for pain freedom from two to 24 h (OR: 2.31, 95% CI: 1.31-4.07). Ibuprofen exhibited the highest effect size for pain relief at 2 hours (OR: 3.21, 95% CI: 1.10-9.34). None of the included drugs was found to reduce the use of rescue drugs from two to 24 h. Zolmitriptan was associated with the highest risk of AEs among all treatments. Acetaminophen appears to have the lowest risk of adverse events, comparable to that of a placebo. Conclusion: Ibuprofen can effectively relieve symptoms, characterized by a favorable benefit-risk profile. Sumatriptan and zolmitriptan nasal sprays also exhibited robust efficacy, specifically among populations with prominent nausea and vomiting. Sumatriptan/naproxen sodium merits consideration, especially in patients exhibiting an inadequate response to monotherapy. Dihydroergotamine demonstrated potential benefits in refractory and chronic migraine; however, high-quality studies are warranted to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.