Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42529210›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Exploring the ambivalence model of suicidality among Iranian patients: a qualitative study with suicide attempters.

Kaveh Qaderi-Bagajan, Zahra Asgari, Matin Khanpayeh, Johanna Freund, Tobias Teismann, Lena Marie Hensel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kaveh Qaderi-BagajanDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra AsgariDepartment of Counseling, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Matin KhanpayehDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.
Johanna FreundLower Bavaria Medical Campus, Mainkofen District Hospital, Deggendorf, Germany.
Tobias TeismannMental Health Research and Treatment Center, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Lena Marie HenselMental Health Research and Treatment Center, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Ambivalence Model of Suicidality (ABS) posits that suicidal experiences are often accompanied by internal conflicts between the desire to live and the urge to die. The model further conceptualizes the suicidal process as consisting of three phases: the uncertainty phase, the transition phase, and the action phase. This qualitative study explores the experiences of Iranian suicide attempters through the lens of the ABS to assess its cross-cultural validity and clinical relevance. Materials and methods: Semi-structured interviews with 15 individuals at Qods Psychiatric Hospital in Sanandaj, Iran, who had recently attempted suicide were conducted. The interviews examined emotional states, internal conflicts, external influences, and decision-making processes aiming to test whether the narratives corresponded to the three ABS phases. A deductive qualitative content analysis was applied: data were transcribed verbatim and coded according to predefined categories (Ambivalence, Transition, Action). Coding was conducted by one author and reviewed by a second author to ensure consistency with the theoretical framework. Representative quotations were extracted to illustrate alignment with the model. Results: Evidence for all three phases of the ABS was found. Participants' narratives reflected each of the model's predefined phases. Ambivalence prior to the suicide attempt was reported in 13 interviews, often accompanied by exhaustion. The transition phase frequently involved a sudden shift into acute suicidality, with some participants describing dissociation. Ambivalence often persisted into the action phase. Conclusion: Findings support the applicability of the ABS in the Iranian context, highlighting ambivalence as a fluctuating yet persistent state throughout the suicidal process and across cultures. Incorporating the ABS into clinical practice might enhance therapeutic approaches, supporting suicide prevention efforts.

Indexed as

ambivalence modelIranian patientsqualitativesuicidalitysuicide attempters

Identifiers

PMID42529210
PMCPMC13416669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.