ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Exploring the ambivalence model of suicidality among Iranian patients: a qualitative study with suicide attempters.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Ambivalence Model of Suicidality (ABS) posits that suicidal experiences are often accompanied by internal conflicts between the desire to live and the urge to die. The model further conceptualizes the suicidal process as consisting of three phases: the uncertainty phase, the transition phase, and the action phase. This qualitative study explores the experiences of Iranian suicide attempters through the lens of the ABS to assess its cross-cultural validity and clinical relevance. Materials and methods: Semi-structured interviews with 15 individuals at Qods Psychiatric Hospital in Sanandaj, Iran, who had recently attempted suicide were conducted. The interviews examined emotional states, internal conflicts, external influences, and decision-making processes aiming to test whether the narratives corresponded to the three ABS phases. A deductive qualitative content analysis was applied: data were transcribed verbatim and coded according to predefined categories (Ambivalence, Transition, Action). Coding was conducted by one author and reviewed by a second author to ensure consistency with the theoretical framework. Representative quotations were extracted to illustrate alignment with the model. Results: Evidence for all three phases of the ABS was found. Participants' narratives reflected each of the model's predefined phases. Ambivalence prior to the suicide attempt was reported in 13 interviews, often accompanied by exhaustion. The transition phase frequently involved a sudden shift into acute suicidality, with some participants describing dissociation. Ambivalence often persisted into the action phase. Conclusion: Findings support the applicability of the ABS in the Iranian context, highlighting ambivalence as a fluctuating yet persistent state throughout the suicidal process and across cultures. Incorporating the ABS into clinical practice might enhance therapeutic approaches, supporting suicide prevention efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.