ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Case Report: Navigating the bleeding-thrombosis paradox: regional nafamostat anticoagulation in a post-intracerebral hemorrhage patient on VV-ECMO.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients following intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) poses a critical dilemma between circuit thrombosis and catastrophic rebleeding. While nafamostat mesylate (NM) has been increasingly explored for ECMO anticoagulation in patients with ICH, it is conventionally administered as a systemic anticoagulant with high activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) targets, which still carries significant bleeding risks. Moreover, whether NM can achieve effective regional anticoagulation in venovenous (VV) ECMO remains highly controversial. Here, we present a post-ICH patient with severe ARDS who required VV-ECMO. Due to suspected rebleeding, anticoagulation was transitioned from heparin to an anticoagulant-free strategy, which subsequently led to significant oxygenator thrombosis. To navigate this crisis, NM was initiated with an ultra-low systemic target, but it initially failed to establish a regional anticoagulant effect when infused at the conventional pre-membrane, post-pump site. Crucially, relocating the NM infusion to the pre-pump position successfully established a significant circuit-to-systemic aPTT gradient. This technical optimization enabled effective circuit anticoagulation while minimizing systemic bleeding risk, allowing for successful ECMO weaning without bleeding complications. This dynamic intra-patient observation highlights the potential impact of infusion site on coagulation outcomes. We hypothesize that harnessing the centrifugal pump's high-shear turbulence for homogenous drug mixing might serve as a crucial prerequisite for achieving regional anticoagulation in VV-ECMO. These findings bridge the gap between theoretical pharmacology and practical circuit engineering, offering a practical preliminary reference for the future anticoagulant management of similar high-bleeding-risk patients on ECMO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.