Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42529176›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026

Targeting Tumour Heterogeneity through sequential timing of anti-hallmark combination therapies -a hypothesis for implementation.

Kumara Swamy, Guruaj Arakeri, Ramaswamy Veena, Anirudh Vagata Srinivas, Amritanshu Ram, Agrahara Sreenivasa Kirthi Koushik, Naik Radheshyam, Rao Mohan Raghavendra, Basavalingaiah S Ajaikumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kumara SwamyClinical Scientist Oncology, HealthCare Global Enterprises Ltd. (HCG), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Guruaj ArakeriDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Center for Academic Research, HCG Cancer Center, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Ramaswamy VeenaHistopathology Department, Triesta Sciences, HealthCare Global Enterprises Ltd., Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Anirudh Vagata SrinivasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, HealthCare Global Enterprises Ltd. (HCG), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Amritanshu RamYoga Department, HealthCare Global Enterprises Ltd., Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Agrahara Sreenivasa Kirthi KoushikDepartment of Radiation Oncology, HealthCare Global Enterprises Ltd. (HCG), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Naik RadheshyamDepartment of Medical Oncology, HealthCare Global Enterprises Ltd., Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Rao Mohan RaghavendraResearch & Integrative Medicine, HealthCare Global Enterprises Ltd., Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Basavalingaiah S AjaikumarHealthCare Global Enterprises Ltd., Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the introduction of the hallmarks of cancer framework over 25 years ago, treatment approaches have evolved into personalized medicine, offering benefits to select patient populations. However, three major components of heterotypic interactions in cancer-mutational evolution of cancer stem cells, epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity (EMP), and cancer-remodeled extracellular matrix (ECM)-remain critical barriers to therapy, particularly in patients who have failed treatment. EMP encompasses a spectrum of to-and-fro transitions between mesenchymal and epithelial states, yielding hybrid phenotypes of evolutionary heterogeneity. These are embedded in the vascular, metabolic, mutational, and immune-suppressive reprogramming of the tumor microenvironment (TME), induced and advanced by the hypoxia-reactive oxygen species (ROS)-hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α)-transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling axis. This review systematically examines the molecular mechanisms underlying EMP, tumor heterogeneity, and the hallmarks of cancer. It explores pharmacological strategies to target tumor burden, epigenetically revert transitional states, and restore immune-editing functions. Based on this analysis, we propose a phased anti-hallmark Combinations, Timing, and Sequencing (CTS) protocol. The methodology integrates vascular normalization, epigenetic modifiers, trimodal radiotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), chemotherapy (CT), and immunotherapy optimization, aiming to improve outcomes while minimizing toxicities. Also, mechanistically, by reverting mesenchymal phenotypes and normalizing the vasculature, the CTS protocol is designed to rescue the immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment-curtailing the recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and regulatory T (Treg) cells. This restores cytotoxic T-cell homing, thereby converting immunologically "cold" tumors into "hot," immunotherapy-responsive lesions.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAnimalsEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionHumansImmunotherapyNeoplastic Stem CellsSignal TransductionTumor Microenvironmentdrug-tolerant persistersepigenetic modifiersepithelial-mesenchymal plasticityhallmarks of cancerimmunotherapystereotactic body radiotherapytumor heterogeneityvascular normalization

Identifiers

PMID42529176
PMCPMC13416416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.