ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Alone together online: a mixed-methods analysis of loneliness, recognition, and peer response in a public digital community.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Loneliness is a significant public health concern, yet most research relies on survey-based methods that capture prevalence and correlates rather than the experiential and social texture of how loneliness is described and responded to in everyday settings. This study examined loneliness-related discourse in r/lonely, one of the largest public subreddits dedicated to the topic. Methods: The study used a convergent mixed-methods design combining large-scale computational text analysis and Braun and Clarke reflexive thematic analysis. The computational strand analyzed 877,799 comments using sentiment analysis, emotion analysis, topic modeling, and keyword co-occurrence network analysis. The qualitative strand analyzed a purposive high-engagement sample of 80 posts and 478 associated comments for thread-based analysis in ATLAS.ti. Results: Five themes were developed: plural forms of loneliness; longing and accumulated disappointment; gendered loneliness and contested recognition; uneven peer support; and rejection of misrecognizing advice. Computational findings showed that positive sentiment and supportive emotional language were prominent at scale, but the qualitative analysis revealed substantial variation in response quality, including predatory behavior, gendered dismissal, and forms of misrecognition that compounded rather than addressed loneliness. Discussion: The findings contribute to understanding loneliness as a multidimensional, socially negotiated condition shaped by relational injury and the uneven politics of recognition in public digital communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.