ArticleHealth science reports2026
Decision-Making About Abortion in an Abortion-Restricted Setting: A Qualitative Study of Young Women in Namibia.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Unsafe abortion is one of the leading causes of maternal death in low- and middle-income countries. In Namibia, restrictive abortion legislation limits young women's reproductive autonomy and contributes to unsafe abortion practices. Despite high teenage pregnancy rates and documented barriers to reproductive health services, little is known about factors influencing abortion decision-making among young women in this restrictive context. This study explored abortion decision-making among young women admitted with abortion-related complications at a referral hospital in Kavango East region, Namibia. Methods: We employed a qualitative exploratory descriptive design. In-depth individual interviews were conducted with 15 young women (aged 16-24 years) admitted with abortion-related complications at a referral hospital in Kavango East region, Namibia, during 2022-2023. Participants were purposively sampled for diversity in age, educational status, and pregnancy history. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase approach. The study received ethical approval from the University of Namibia Research Ethics Committee. Results: Participants' ages ranged from 16 to 24 years; 10/15 were currently attending school. and 8/15 had previous pregnancies. Abortion decision-making was highly influenced by personal and interpersonal factors operating within a restrictive legal and social context. Key themes included: (1) fear of rejection by parents and community; (2) lack of social and financial support; (3) desire to pursue education; and (4) expectations to bear children within marriage. Young women demonstrated an understanding of abortion risks yet felt they had limited alternatives. Participants expressed mixed views on abortion legalization, with concerns about reproductive autonomy, social discrimination, and future fertility. Conclusions: Young women's abortion decisions are shaped by complex internal factors (personal aspirations, fears) and external factors (social stigma, lack of support, restrictive policies). Understanding these factors is critical for developing youth-centered reproductive health policies and services. Our findings support the need for policy reform to make safe abortion services available and accessible to young women in Namibia, potentially reducing unsafe abortion-related morbidity and mortality in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.