Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42529116›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2026

Understanding crisis dynamics during public health emergencies: an integrated framework of social consequences, trust, and behavioral responses.

Wenyue Xu, Naizhe Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wenyue XuJoint International Research Laboratory of Catastrophe Simulation and Systemic Risk Governance, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai, China.
Naizhe LiJoint International Research Laboratory of Catastrophe Simulation and Systemic Risk Governance, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health emergencies are inherently social crises that disrupt institutions, livelihoods, and everyday social functioning. However, the factors that determine whether their crisis dimensions are amplified, sustained, or attenuated remain insufficiently understood from an integrated, macro-systemic perspective. This review synthesizes evidence across epidemiology, sociology, psychology, and public health to examine the interacting mechanisms that shape the social dynamics of epidemics. We develop a framework in which social consequences, trust dynamics, behavioral and psychological responses, and information environments jointly influence crisis trajectories through reciprocal feedback processes. Trust is conceptualized as a critical mediating factor linking governance to public behavior, while inequalities and information environments condition whether disruptions are contained or amplified. We conclude that epidemic preparedness should move beyond a pathogen-centered model to integrate social protection, trust-sensitive communication, mental health support, and infodemic management.

Indexed as

EmergenciesPublic HealthTrustHumansinfodemicpublic health emergenciessocial consequencessocial resiliencetrust erosion

Identifiers

PMID42529116
PMCPMC13416440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.