Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42529111›Full record

ArticleJCEM case reports2026

Intrathyroidal parathyroid carcinoma in a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.

Arita Thatte, Marina Basina, Kaniksha Desai

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JCEM case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arita ThatteDivision of Endocrinology, Gerontology, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3018-3261
Marina BasinaDivision of Endocrinology, Gerontology, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3192-6989
Kaniksha DesaiDivision of Endocrinology, Gerontology, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4680-1965

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary hyperparathyroidism occurs in up to 95% of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). However, only a few cases of parathyroid carcinoma have been reported, and only one case of intrathyroidal parathyroid carcinoma. We describe the case of a 41-year-old male with a history of MEN1 and primary hyperparathyroidism who developed hypercalcemia to 13.1 mg/dL (SI: 3.3 mmol/L) (reference range [RR], 8.6-10.3 mg/dL [SI: 2.2-2.6 mmol/L]) with parathyroid hormone (PTH) 454 pg/mL (SI: 48.1 pmol/L) (RR, 15-65 pg/mL [SI: 1.6-6.9 pmol/L]). Neck ultrasonography showed a highly suspicious intrathyroidal 3.6 cm nodule. The patient had a lobectomy, and final pathology showed a 3.1 × 1.6 × 1.2 cm parathyroid carcinoma. After the surgery, calcium dropped to 6.0 mg/dL (SI: 1.5 mmol/L) with PTH of 11 pg/mL (SI: 1.2 pmol/L) requiring oral calcium supplements, calcitriol, and hydrochlorothiazide. Laboratory tests at 12 months on these medications showed calcium of 9.3 mg/dL (SI: 2.3 mmol/L) and PTH 21 pg/mL (SI: 2.2 pmol/L) indicating recovery of parathyroid function without recurrence, and calcitriol was discontinued. This case illustrates that a high index of suspicion for malignancy should be maintained for intrathyroidal parathyroid adenoma in the setting of severe hypercalcemia, especially in MEN1.

Indexed as

intrathyroidal parathyroidMEN1 syndromeparathyroid carcinomathyroid nodule

Identifiers

PMID42529111
PMCPMC13416389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.