Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42529105›Full record

ReviewOncology reviews2026

Models of high-grade serous carcinoma of tubo-ovarian origin.

Achuth Padmanabhan, Shailendra Dwivedi, Melissa A Merritt, Priyanka Verma, Ronald J Buckanovich, Jessica D Lang, Hannah Dimmick, Kenneth P Nephew, Ronny Drapkin, Lindsay W Brubaker and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncology reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Achuth PadmanabhanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Shailendra DwivediPeggy and Charles Stephenson Cancer Center, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Melissa A MerrittThe Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, and Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Priyanka VermaDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Ronald J BuckanovichUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Jessica D LangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Hannah DimmickDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Kenneth P NephewMelvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Ronny DrapkinPenn Ovarian Cancer Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Lindsay W BrubakerDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Benjamin G BitlerDivision of Reproductive Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.

Funding

Tumor Microenvironment and Metastasis ProgramP30CA082709 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI Jun Wan · 1999 to 2026
$59.3M
Project 3: Hedgehog Inhibition to Enhance Response to ICI TherapyP50CA272218 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Ronald J Buckanovich, Robert Page Edwards · 2023 to 2026
$11.0M
Targeting Wnt signaling in therapy-resistant ovarian cancerR37CA261987 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Benjamin G Bitler · 2021 to 2026
$2.4M
Role of protein kinase ADCK5 in ovarian cancerR03CA282712 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY · PI PADMANABHAN, ACHUTH · 2023 to 2023
$150k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA082709NCI NIH HHS P50 CA272218NCI NIH HHS R03 CA282712NCI NIH HHS R37 CA261987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological models aim to recapitulate the molecular and histologic characteristics, as well as the carcinogenesis of the disease of interest, to enable high-fidelity experimentation and impactful translational development. In high-grade serous carcinoma of ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal origin, there is a need to regularly re-evaluate the experimental models being employed to address research questions. This review aims to provide a resource for better understanding the applications, strengths, and limitations of the available models. This work discusses the origin and carcinogenesis of high-grade serous carcinoma and reviews normal cell-of-origin models, as understanding the cellular origin is critical to experimental efforts focused on pathogenesis, disease progression, and prevention. High-grade serous carcinoma cell lines are discussed, including essential and complementary molecular features, cell line management, and limitations. Next, the review examines advances in organoids, with a specific focus on patient-derived organoids from ascites and single-cell suspensions, organ-on-a-chip platforms, and tissue slice technologies. Finally, given the heterogeneity of epithelial ovarian cancer in general, and high-grade serous carcinoma in particular, and the evolving understanding of the importance of the tumor microenvironment,

Indexed as

cell lineshigh-grade serousmodelsorganoidorganoidsorgan-on-a-chipovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID42529105
PMCPMC13416685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.