SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
High-flow nasal oxygen in perioperative and critical care: a bibliometric analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO), also known as high-flow nasal cannula, is an important noninvasive respiratory support strategy in perioperative and critical care practice. As the literature has expanded across multiple clinical contexts, a structured overview is needed to clarify the development, knowledge base, and emerging priorities of the field. Methods: We conducted a bibliometric and visual analysis of HFNO research using English-language articles and reviews retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and PubMed for the period 2000-2025. After screening, merging, and deduplication, 2,314 unique publications were included. Bibliometrix in R was used for performance analysis, thematic mapping, and thematic evolution; VOSviewer for collaboration analysis; and CiteSpace for co-citation analysis, keyword clustering, timeline visualization, burst detection, and dual-map overlay. Results: HFNO research showed sustained exponential growth, with marked acceleration after 2018 and especially after 2020. The literature was concentrated in respiratory medicine, critical care, and anesthesiology journals, with Respiratory Care ranking first in publication output. The United States and China were the leading contributors, while several French institutions, particularly Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, were prominent in the institutional network. Co-citation analysis identified major clusters related to acute respiratory failure, perioperative oxygen therapy, preoxygenation strategies, and coronavirus disease. Keyword and thematic analyses indicated a shift from early emphasis on perioperative oxygenation and postoperative respiratory support toward broader critical care application and, more recently, toward context-specific deployment, acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, awake prone positioning, treatment monitoring, and the ROX index. Conclusion: HFNO research has evolved from a focused literature on oxygenation support into a broader and more clinically differentiated field spanning perioperative and critical care practice. Current hotspots are increasingly centered on context-specific use, monitoring, failure prediction, and escalation decisions. Future research should prioritize clinically actionable patient stratification, standardized outcome definitions, and protocol-based integration of HFNO across different care pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.