ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2026
Vacuum-Assisted Closure Device as a Suction Tool in First Stage Autologous Auricular Reconstruction.
Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Autologous auricular reconstruction typically involves the fabrication and insertion of a costal cartilage framework. Achieving a natural contour requires the skin envelope and cartilage framework to remain in close touch. Traditional suction drains might not be able to sustain a constant negative pressure, leading to suboptimal outcomes. This study evaluates the novel use of a vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) device as a suction tool in the first stage autologous auricular reconstruction. Methodology: Twenty patients; with unilateral microtia underwent autologous ear reconstruction using costal cartilage graft were selected, 10 patients used a syringe as a traditional method for suction while 10 patients underwent reconstruction with the incorporation of a VAC device to provide an uniform negative pressure and promote adherence of the skin flap to the underlying structure. Outcome measures included skin flap viability, contour definition, complication rates, and patient satisfaction. Results: Patients reported high satisfaction rates with early aesthetic outcomes higher for the VAC group (22 ± 1.49) than syringe suction (18 ± 1.17) ( Conclusion: The VAC device is a safe and effective tool for optimizing surgical outcomes in the first stage of autologous auricular reconstruction. Its application promotes consistent contouring, reduces complications, and enhances patient satisfaction. Further studies are warranted to validate long-term benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.