Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42529041›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026

Methodological innovations in studying marginalized populations in research on neurodegeneration and ageing.

Anja K Leist, Eva Teyssier, Jure Mur

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anja K LeistInstitute of Gerontology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Eva TeyssierInstitute for Research on Socio-Economic Inequality, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Jure MurInstitute for Research on Socio-Economic Inequality, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Underrepresented populations, often characterized by minority ethnicity, sex/gender or low socioeconomic status, have a higher risk burden and more adverse lifetime experiences of conditions negatively impacting cognitive health than better represented populations. There are several methodological challenges of research in and with marginalized populations that hinder research on improvements to their cognitive health. This review aims at presenting challenges of recruitment, data collection, and statistical analysis, and points to innovative methods for alleviating these challenges. Careful recruitment and data collection can ensure that marginalized populations are sufficiently represented in research. Multiple factors, including the clinical presentation of symptoms, accelerated biological ageing, and early life adversity need to be incorporated into statistical analysis. Innovative methodologies in research on neurodegeneration and ageing can improve the accuracy of descriptive, predictive and causal investigations, and at least partially address data inequity. These methods can contribute to the aims of reducing inequities in the distribution of healthcare and social care resources.

Indexed as

biological ageingbrain ageingcognitive ageingdementiamarginalized groupsmethodological innovationssocial determinants of health (SDOH)

Identifiers

PMID42529041
PMCPMC13415801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.