ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Person-centred environments and nurses
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A supportive practice environment is essential for nurse retention and to enable nurses to provide effective person-centred care. When nurses are prevented from acting according to their professional values, they may experience moral distress, potentially leading to disengagement and increased turnover intention. Although the impact of the practice environment on nurse outcomes is well documented, the pathways linking person-centred aspects of the practice environment to turnover intention remain underexplored. This study aimed to test a theoretical model linking these factors to inform targeted retention efforts. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of nurses ( Results: Both models showed acceptable fit following theoretically justified modifications (Model A: CFI = 0.930, RMSEA = 0.060; Model B: CFI = 0.926, RMSEA = 0.047). In Model A, predictors explained 51.8% of the variance in person-centred climate. The practice environment emerged as the sole significant predictor of a person-centred climate ( Conclusions: Findings can be used to inform retention strategies at both the meso and micro levels, including the development of monitoring tools for turnover intention and measures to support practice development for teams and individual practitioners. Future research should further explore mediating mechanisms to inform retention efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.