Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42528978›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

A cutset-type kernel possibilistic fuzzy c-means method for robust image segmentation.

Jintao Wang, Zhenxing Xu, Kang Feng, Liting Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jintao WangCollege of Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Wanjiang University of Technology, Maanshan, Anhui, China.
Zhenxing XuCollege of Systems Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Kang FengCollege of Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Wanjiang University of Technology, Maanshan, Anhui, China.
Liting ZhangCollege of Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Wanjiang University of Technology, Maanshan, Anhui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Robust image segmentation remains difficult for lightweight unsupervised clustering when nonlinear class overlap and sparse noise contamination occur together. Methods: This study proposes and evaluates a cutset-type kernel possibilistic fuzzy c-means method (C-KPFCM), combining Gaussian-kernel distance modeling with cutset-based correction of possibilistic typicalities. The kernel term changes the distance geometry for nonlinear structure, while the cutset operation suppresses non-winning typical values during center estimation. Results: On the three reconstructed complex-background cases, C-KPFCM obtains the best average result among the tested classical fuzzy clustering methods, but the gain over the closest cutset-only baseline is small and not statistically reliable under an exact sign test. A 90-instance stress test further shows that C-KPFCM is clearly better than K-means, PFCM, and KPFCM, but not generally better than C-PFCM under broader disturbance mixtures. Additional noise, parameter-sensitivity, repeated-run, runtime, and real-image pilot analyses support a restrained conclusion. Conclusion: Cutset correction is the empirically dominant robustness mechanism, while kernelization is a conditional complement whose cost is justified only when nonlinear geometry is expected to matter. Code and reproducibility scripts are available at: jtwang-AI/Image-Segmentation-C-KPFCM.

Indexed as

cutset-type clusteringimage segmentationkernel possibilistic fuzzy c-meansrobust clusteringunsupervised segmentation

Identifiers

PMID42528978
PMCPMC13416242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.