ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Non-component clinical feature-based machine learning for disease activity risk stratification in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a multi-center retrospective validation study.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: JADAS27 is widely used to assess juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) disease activity, but complete scoring is impractical in many clinical settings because it requires simultaneous physician global assessment (PhGA), patient/parent global assessment (PtGA), active joint count (AJC), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). We asked whether non-component clinical variables alone-strictly excluding all four JADAS27 constituents-can classify JADAS27-defined activity strata. Methods: In this retrospective multi-center study, 800 patients with JIA were enrolled from CARRA ( Results: SVM achieved the best external validation performance (accuracy 0.731, 95% CI 0.657-0.797; macro AUC 0.918, 95% CI 0.887-0.945). Class-wise recall was highest for inactive (82.4%) and high activity (77.4%), with most errors between adjacent classes. SHAP and permutation importance analyses consistently identified CHAQ score, JIA subtype, pain score, limited joint count, and C-reactive protein as the most influential predictors. Removing all three proxy variables reduced accuracy to 0.619 and macro AUC to 0.843, indicating that both proxy and non-proxy features contribute independently. Sensitivity analysis with subtype-specific cutoffs yielded comparable performance (accuracy 0.713). Conclusion: Strictly non-component clinical features can stratify JADAS27-defined disease activity with clinically meaningful external performance. This approach may support early risk stratification when formal JADAS27 scoring is unavailable, and complements rather than replaces physician assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.