ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Study on the correlation between ventricular arrhythmia and heart rate variability in patients with coronary heart disease.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) is a common complication in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), and heart rate variability (HRV) is considered a potential marker for VA risk. Aims: This study aimed to analyse the correlation between HRV and VA in patients with CHD. Methods: From January 2020 to July 2024, patients with CHD who were treated at our hospital were divided into two groups, based on the presence of VA: theVA group (VA present) and the control group (no VA). Heart rate variability indices were measured using 24-hour dynamic electrocardiogram monitoring. The HRV parameters included the standard deviation of sinus R-R (N-N) interval (SDNN), the standard deviation of sinus R-R (N-N) mean value every 5 min (SDANN), the root mean square of adjacent RR interval difference (rMSSD), and the percentage of the number of adjacent R-R interval differences >50 ms in the total number of sinus beats (PNN50). Clinical data were compared between groups, and linear regression was used to explore the relationship between HRV and VA. Results: The HRV indices SDNN, SDANN, rMSSD, and PNN50 were significantly lower in the VA group than in the non-VA group ( Conclusion: The HRV indices, particularly SDANN, rMSSD, and PNN50, were significantly associated with the occurrence of VA in patients with CHD and may serve as potential indicators for VA risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.