ArticleBiomedical engineering education2026
Implementation of a Biomedical Research Training Program for Early-Stage Undergraduate Students to Inspire Development of a STEM Professional Identity.
Article in Biomedical engineering education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: This study sought to develop an undergraduate research training program for early-stage students with interest in biomedical engineering. The ultimate goal was to foster a sense of self-identity within the participants as STEM professionals, develop their professional and technical skills, and provide training in biomedical engineering research to under-resourced student populations that would not otherwise be exposed to biomedical engineering research until late in their careers. Methods: The training program was intentionally designed to leverage and synergistically combine the following pedagogical frameworks: Cognitive Theory Apprenticeship, Asset-based Mentoring, and Community of Practice. The program was designed as a two-year program starting in the pre-first-year summer with a bridge program, research rotations in laboratories throughout the first year, a cohort-led research project in the second year, and a four-course sequence emphasizing the biomedical research process, development as scholars, and networking. Results: All members of Cohort 1 successfully completed the program, with 2 out of 3 participants transitioning into the university's Honor's Program. All members of Cohort 2 successfully completed half of the program prior to early programmatic termination by the funding agency due to changes in federal initiatives. Further, all participants self-reported an increase in self-identity as a STEM professional, with a majority of participants reporting continued interest in research, the biomedical field, and STEM. Conclusions: This program provided participants from under-resourced backgrounds with the resources and opportunities to succeed, and these students exemplified the potential of participants in similar programs, evidenced by the outstanding research performance achieved by the students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.