ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
A hybrid deep learning and cellular automata framework with fractional derivatives for skin type and skin disease classification.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A hybrid deep learning and mathematical modeling approach to automatic identification of skin type and multi-class classification of skin diseases based on dermatological images are proposed in this paper. A coherent mechanism to combine deep features learning and texture modeling approaches mathematically is a necessity for improved skin type classification and skin diseases categorizations. Methods: We propose to combine convolutional neural networks, cellular automata and fractional-order derivatives in one technique. Beside CNN models based on transfer learning, this system makes use of cellular automata with online tessellation to characterize explicitly the dynamic evolution of skin textures. Specifically, a 2-dimensional Moore neighborhood cellular automata based on both totalistic and outer-totalistic rules to illustrate the local relations of neighboring pixels, the smooth aspect of skin textures, and the oily/dry distribution and pore density, which are indicators for characterizing dry, normal, and oily skin type. The models of automata characterize skin by regions and make the texture analysis stable by iterating over tessellated images. In feature extraction part, fractional-order derivatives are used for better sensitivity to edge continuity and detailed texture variations. Many types of fractional-order derivatives can be derived but the Grnwald-Letnikov and the Caputo fractional derivatives were selected for their capability to be used with discrete image grids and long-range relationship modeling. They enable better detection of delicate texture patterns that can be otherwise mistaken by traditional CNN models through an improved multiscale representation. The cellular automata-based and fractional features are combined with deep features taken from fine-tuned ResNet topologies, yielding a robust hybrid representation. Results & Discussion: The suggested method significantly reduces the misclassification of normal skin and increases skin type classification accuracy by approximately 1.2 percentage points, according to experimental evaluation on publicly available benchmark skin datasets. The integrated model achieved an accuracy of 92.8%, sensitivity of 91.4%, and F1-score of 91.7% for skin disease classification of five common dermatological conditions, while achieving an accuracy of 92.4%, sensitivity of 91.1%, and F1-score of 91.4% for skin type classification. The proposed framework therefore offers an effective and scalable approach for intelligent dermatological assessment and skin image analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.