ArticleBiology methods & protocols2026
Investigating the efficacy of skin swabbing as a minimally invasive method of genetic sampling from Indian amphibians.
Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amphibians are facing an unprecedented extinction crisis; 41% of the species are currently on the verge of extinction, making them among the most threatened vertebrates. One of the integral components in amphibian conservation is genetic research, which provides vital insights into their fitness and long-term persistence. Molecular studies on amphibians most often use invasive methods that are detrimental to them. Instead, minimally invasive methods such as cloacal, buccal, and skin swabbing can be effective. In this study, we collected skin swab samples from multiple anuran species in the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot and the urban areas of Bengaluru, India, to assess the efficacy of skin swabs for generating genetic data without compromising animal welfare. Two extraction methods (salt vs Qiagen™ DNeasy kit) and two swab storage conditions (dry vs wet) were assessed. There was no significant difference in DNA yield between the two DNA extraction methods, whereas kit-based extractions consistently yielded DNA within the ideal purity range (A260/280 = 1.8-2.0). Swab storage did not significantly affect DNA concentration, but dry swabs provided significantly higher purity. Samples showed 86.36% amplification success on the gel, and 67.05% yielded high-quality DNA sequences suitable for downstream analyses. Our results demonstrate that minimally invasive skin swabs are a non-lethal technique that can be replicated in anurans using less DNA. This is the first study from the Indian tropical region to utilise multiple species of varying body sizes to demonstrate the feasibility of minimally invasive skin swabbing as a method for anuran research and conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.