Trial reportFrontiers in medicine2026
High-intensity versus low-intensity laser acupuncture in chronic, non-specific low back pain: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06280846 (High-intensity Versus Low-intensity Laser Acupuncture in Chronic, Non-specific Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
High-intensity Versus Low-intensity Laser Acupuncture in Chronic, Non-specific Low Back Pain: a Double-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of High-Intensity Laser Acupuncture on Muscle Performance, Pain, and Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP) is a musculoskeletal condition characterized by persistent discomfort, weak trunk muscles, exhaustion, and disability. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of high-intensity laser acupuncture (HILA) and low-intensity laser acupuncture (LILA), combined with exercise, on strength of trunk extensors, fatigue, level of pain, range of motion (ROM) of lumbar flexion, and disability in patients with CNSLBP. Materials and methods: 60 participants with CNSLBP were divided into three groups in this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial: the high-intensity laser (HILA) group, who received HILA over 15 acupuncture points along with exercises; the low-intensity laser (LILA) group, who received LILA over the same points plus exercises; and the sham group, who received sham laser in addition to exercises. The interventions were received three times/week for four consecutive weeks. The strength of trunk extensors, fatigue, pain, lumbar flexion ROM, and disability were measured at baseline, after 4 weeks, and at a 1-month follow-up. The assessment tools used included isokinetic dynamometry, the visual analogue scale (VAS), the modified Schober test (MST), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results: Initial analysis showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the three groups ( Conclusion: Patients with CNSLBP may have a short-term benefit from HILA and LILA combined with exercise rather than from exercise alone in terms of trunk extensor strength and fatigue, pain, lumbar flexion ROM, and disability. However, both laser treatments showed comparable effects on fatigue and disability; HILA appears to be more effective than LILA in improving trunk extensor strength and relieving pain. To define the ideal treatment parameters and to evaluate long-term effects, further research is required. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier [NCT06280846].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.