ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Interpretable machine learning for identifying determinants of high hypertension burden under extreme heat vulnerability: evidence from Maryland, USA.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extreme heat poses increasing risks to cardiovascular health, yet fine-scale determinants of heat-related hypertension burden remain insufficiently understood. This study examines high hypertension burden in a heat-vulnerability context across 1,385 census tracts in Maryland using an interpretable machine learning framework. An XGBoost model was developed to classify census tracts with high hypertension burden using demographic, socioeconomic, built-environment, heat anomaly, and adaptive-capacity variables. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were then used to identify key predictors, assess their contribution to model predictions, and examine non-linear effects. The model achieved strong predictive performance, with an accuracy of 0.819, balanced accuracy of 0.806, ROC-AUC of 0.821, and PR-AUC of 0.909. Results show substantial spatial heterogeneity in hypertension burden, with high-burden tracts concentrated in Baltimore City, Prince George's County, southern Maryland, western Maryland, and parts of the Eastern Shore. SHAP results indicate that African-American population share, older-adult population share, and low educational attainment were the strongest predictors, followed by summer maximum air temperature, non-vegetated land area, and lack of air conditioning. Dependence plots further reveal non-linear and threshold-like relationships, suggesting that predicted risk increases sharply beyond certain levels of demographic vulnerability, educational disadvantage, heat exposure, and limited cooling access. These findings indicate that high hypertension burden in a heat-vulnerability context is shaped by the intersection of structural social vulnerability, demographic susceptibility, environmental exposure, and household adaptive capacity. The study demonstrates the value of combining XGBoost and SHAP for tract-level heat-health risk assessment and provides policy-relevant evidence for targeted heat adaptation, cooling assistance, and public health preparedness in Maryland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.