Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42528893›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2026

Effects of

Ji Yanyi, Wang Xingzhi, Daniel H K Chow

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Effect ofNutrients · 2026
    Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ji YanyiGuangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Wang XingzhiGuangzhou Institute of Sports Science, Guangzhou, China.
Daniel H K ChowDepartment of Health and Physical Education, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Objective: This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy of Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and the Cochrane Library from database inception through March 11, 2026. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Given the substantial heterogeneity in probiotic strains, dosing regimens, and outcome measures, a narrative synthesis was conducted to integrate the findings. Results: The efficacy of Conclusion: Supplementation with Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/myprospero, identifier CRD420261292490.

Indexed as

exercise performancefatigue recoveryLactiplantibacillus plantarumpostbioticsprobioticsstrain specificity

Identifiers

PMID42528893
PMCPMC13415575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.