ReviewProgress in earth and planetary science2026
Rheology of the lower mantle: an alternative review.
Review in Progress in earth and planetary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rheology of the lower mantle: an alternative review.Progress in earth and planetary science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the rheology of the Earth's lower mantle is essential for modelling mantle convection and its consequences for the geodynamical, thermal and chemical evolution of the planet. However, the extreme pressure-temperature conditions, the long natural timescales, and the complexity of deep-mantle mineralogy make it difficult to constrain mantle viscosity from experiments alone. In this review, we examine an alternative approach based on mineral physics and multiscale numerical modelling, tracing its theoretical foundations and its development over the last decades. We first outline the key physical mechanisms governing plastic deformation in lower-mantle minerals-point defects, dislocations, diffusion, and grain-boundary processes-and the conditions under which they operate. We then summarize the major experimental advances that provide essential constraints for these models. Building on this foundation, we review the evolution of multiscale modelling strategies, from first-principles calculations of defect energetics and dislocation cores to mesoscale dislocation dynamics and polycrystal-scale formulations. Using ferropericlase and bridgmanite as archetypal examples, we show how successive developments have progressively linked atomic-scale mechanisms with macroscopic rheology under deep-mantle conditions. Finally, we discuss current limitations and outstanding challenges, including the scarcity of diffusion data at high pressures, uncertainties in defect chemistry, and the need to integrate multiphase and multimechanism deformation. Together, these elements provide a coherent view of the present capabilities of mineral-physics-based rheology and outline a roadmap for future efforts to improve our understanding of deep-mantle dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.