ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2026
Implementation of a Manual Vacuum Drainage System for Odontogenic Space Infections: Technical Note.
Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Odontogenic space infections typically require surgical incision and drainage for effective source control. While passive drainage remains the standard, manual closed vacuum systems are proposed to enhance exudate evacuation and wound management. This technical note describes the implementation and feasibility of a manual vacuum drainage system in a general hospital setting. Methods: The system utilizes a 4.8 mm perforated silicone tube connected to a manual accordion-shaped reservoir. Following surgical debridement, a hermetic seal is created using a 4-0 nylon purse-string suture and reinforced with transparent adhesive film. Negative pressure is generated by manual compression of the reservoir. Results: The technique was safe and straightforward to implement. However, operational challenges included frequent loss of the vacuum seal due to patient mobility and drain obstruction by viscous exudate in the absence of continuous irrigation. These factors led to increased nursing maintenance and lower staff acceptability compared to conventional methods. Conclusion: Manual closed vacuum drainage is a technically viable and safe alternative for odontogenic infections but is limited by operational constraints in non-intensive care settings. Future refinements, such as integrated irrigation channels, are necessary to optimize clinical performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.