Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42528837›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Optimization of water and nitrogen management strategies for jujube under sand tube irrigation based on regression analysis and TOPSIS method.

Youshuai Bai, Fang Wang, Chengbao Wang, Xiaogang Liu, Lin Huo, Xia Zhao, Xiangyi Fang, Shenghai Jia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Youshuai BaiInstitute of Soil, Fertilizer and Water-Saving Agriculture, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Fang WangDingxi City Agricultural Product Quality and Safety Monitoring and Testing Station, Dingxi, China.
Chengbao WangInstitute of Soil, Fertilizer and Water-Saving Agriculture, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Xiaogang LiuInstitute of Soil, Fertilizer and Water-Saving Agriculture, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Lin HuoInstitute of Soil, Fertilizer and Water-Saving Agriculture, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Xia ZhaoCollege of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Xiangyi FangQinfeng Forestry Experimental Station of Minqin County, Wuwei, China.
Shenghai JiaCollege of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sand tube irrigation (STI) is one of the most considerable irrigation techniques for increasing water productivity in arid areas. However, it is unclear whether there is still room for further improvements in jujube yield and water productivity under STI with different irrigation and nitrogen application levels. Methods: To solve this problem, a two-year field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of different irrigation and nitrogen applications on soil water storage, water consumption, jujube yield, and fruit quality, as well as water and nitrogen use efficiency under STI, and to determine the optimal irrigation and nitrogen application solution by the entropy weight-based TOPSIS method. Results: The results showed that irrigation very significantly ( Discussion: The research will provide technical support for the optimal agricultural water and nitrogen management of jujube in arid areas.

Indexed as

jujube qualityjujube yieldmanagement strategiessand tube irrigationTOPSIS method

Identifiers

PMID42528837
PMCPMC13415375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.