ReviewNew forests2026
Reforestation following megafires in boreal forests: silvicultural challenges and available tools.
Review in New forests, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In North America, climate change is projected to increase wildfire activity, leading to more frequent megafires that will likely overwhelm current regeneration processes, threatening the resilience of boreal forests and the services that they provide. The devastating 2023 wildfire season exposes the magnitude of the challenge facing North America, including eastern regions. Post-fire reforestation needs can far exceed current capacity, which relies almost exclusively on manual tree planting. Our review addresses urgent needs to increase reforestation capacity to restore vast burned landscapes that are experiencing regeneration failures. We first provide an overview of current challenges and promising reforestation methods for tree planting and direct seeding. Challenges include addressing regeneration failure risks and limited road access, and strengthening reforestation value chains amid workforce shortages. We discuss the suitability of traditional and innovative reforestation methods, considering these challenges, to situate them within a broader restoration strategy. We show that using multiple methods expands reforestation capacity by providing more options for reforesting sites with a wider range of biophysical conditions. However, robust evidence on method-specific outcomes across different timescales is still needed to understand their effectiveness for post-fire restoration. Future research should further assess the cost-benefits of these methods and improve our ability to predict and mitigate regeneration failures across varying forest landscapes to support efficient restoration efforts. Our work provides a foundation for transferring current knowledge into strategic reforestation planning and execution. It is relevant to communities, scientists, governments and managers seeking to adapt regeneration silviculture to changing fire regimes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.