ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Linking urban park soundscape cognitive image to recreational visitors' perceived restorativeness: the mediating role of emotional pleasure.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accelerating urbanization has intensified psychological stress and mental health problems among urban residents. As accessible natural spaces for leisure and recreation, urban parks have received increasing scholarly attention for the potential restorative effects of their soundscapes. Existing studies have mainly focused on the restorative benefits of visual landscapes or examined only the direct relationship between soundscapes and perceived restorativeness. However, the potential psychological pathway through which soundscape cognitive image is associated with perceived restorativeness via emotional pleasure has not been sufficiently clarified. Based on the stimulus-organism-response framework, this study constructed a model linking soundscape cognitive image, emotional pleasure, and perceived restorativeness. Methods: Twelve urban parks in Foshan, China, were selected as case study sites. A field questionnaire survey was conducted among recreational visitors, and 300 valid responses were collected. Python 3.10 was used for data processing and descriptive analyses, and AMOS 26.0 was used for structural equation modeling and mediation tests. Results: The results showed that soundscape cognitive image was positively associated with emotional pleasure. Soundscape cognitive image was positively associated with the being away, fascination, and compatibility dimensions of perceived restorativeness, whereas its direct relationship with coherence was not significant. Emotional pleasure was positively associated with being away and compatibility, was not significantly associated with fascination, and showed a significant negative association with coherence. Bootstrap analysis further indicated that emotional pleasure served as a significant indirect pathway between soundscape cognitive image and being away, compatibility, and coherence. The indirect pathway for coherence was negative and the total relationship was not significant, suggesting that this result should be interpreted cautiously. No significant indirect pathway was found for fascination. Discussion: This study extends the application of the stimulus-organism-response framework to urban park soundscape research by showing how visitors' subjective soundscape cognition is related to perceived restorativeness through emotional pleasure. Because the study used cross-sectional self-report data, the findings should be interpreted as evidence of statistical associations and potential psychological pathways rather than as proof of causal effects. The results provide empirical references for soundscape evaluation and health-oriented urban park planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.