Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42528809›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in public health2026

Improving medication safety and efficiency in hospital pharmacy through a pharmacist-led, low-code mobile application: a prospective study.

Bin Li, Xin Chen, Lijuan Xiong

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bin LiDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Xin ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Lijuan XiongDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Traditional manual inventory management in hospital pharmacies is error-prone and inefficient, jeopardizing patient safety. Low-code platforms enable clinicians to build software, but their impact needs rigorous evaluation. To evaluate a pharmacist-led, low-code mobile inventory application's impact on operational efficiency, accuracy, and labor in a hospital pharmacy. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted over 12 months in a 1,460-bed tertiary hospital (formulary: 3,850 items). Pharmacists used a low-code platform to design, build, and iteratively refine a mobile inventory application through agile sprints. The application was deployed across twelve pharmacy subzones. Primary outcomes were inventory cycle time, error rate, stock variance, and labor allocation. Analysis included paired comparisons, multiple linear regression, discrete-event simulation for scalability projection, and sensitivity analysis. Results: Average weekly inventory cycle time decreased by 60.3%, from 14.6 ± 2.3 to 5.8 ± 1.1 h ( Conclusion: The pharmacist-led, low-code model was associated with marked improvements in pharmacy inventory management, showing substantial gains in efficiency, accuracy, and clinical time reallocation. It offers a scalable, cost-effective framework for healthcare digitization centered on domain expertise.

Indexed as

Efficiency, OrganizationalInventories, HospitalMedication ErrorsMobile ApplicationsPharmacistsPharmacy Service, HospitalHumansPatient SafetyProspective Studiesagile developmenthospital pharmacylow-code platformsmobile inventorypatient safety

Identifiers

PMID42528809
PMCPMC13415360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.