ArticleFrontiers in neurology
A modified frailty index to identify high-risk groups for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a motor neuron disease characterized by progressive muscle weakness and poor prognosis, which requires early detection to optimize therapeutic outcomes. This study aims to develop a risk stratification tools for ALS and to assist in identifying high-risk groups. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted using the UK Biobank (500,033 participants), which were split into training sets and validation sets. We calculated the frailty index (FI) and modified frailty index (MFI) for the participants and estimated their association with ALS. Finally, two risk stratification tools were constructed and the time-dependent ROC curve was utilized to evaluate the discriminatory performance of each model. Results: Among the 49 deficits in FI, we identified five deficits that were significantly associated with ALS, including falls, whole-body pain, long-standing illness, disability or infirmity, self-rated health and tiredness or lethargy in last 2 weeks, which together constructed the MFI. Both the FI and MFI were associated with a higher risk of ALS (HR Conclusion: By focusing on deficits associated with ALS, the MFI may improve the ability to identify individuals at elevated risk of the disease. It could therefore serve as a valuable screening tool for risk stratification in the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.