ReviewFrontiers in digital health2026
The impact of training and education programs for healthcare professionals on video- and text-based consultations in ensuring healthcare quality: a scoping review.
Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rapid expansion of video- and text-based consultations has transformed healthcare delivery, particularly during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. As virtual care becomes embedded in routine practice, healthcare professionals require appropriate training to deliver safe and effective digital healthcare. Objective: This scoping review aimed to map and synthesize evidence on training and education programs designed to prepare healthcare professionals for video- and text-based consultations and to examine reported outcomes, facilitators, and barriers. Methods: This review followed Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and was reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR and PRISMA-S guidelines. Multiple bibliographic databases and grey literature sources were searched for studies published between January 1, 2003, and December 24, 2024. Eligible studies included those involving healthcare professionals receiving training in video consultations or text-based communication. Two reviewers independently conducted study selection and data extraction. Findings were synthesized descriptively. Results: Twenty studies were included. Training approaches varied considerably and included workshops, webinars, online modules, simulations, telehealth Objective Structured Clinical Examinations, and hybrid programs. Most studies reported improvements in confidence, perceived competence, and readiness to provide virtual care. However, outcomes were predominantly based on short-term self-reported measures, with limited evidence relating to long-term skill retention, patient outcomes, or organizational impact. Most included studies focused on video-based consultations, while evidence relating specifically to text-based consultation training was limited. Common challenges included virtual physical examinations, technological barriers, and maintaining patient engagement. Conclusions: Telehealth training programs are increasingly used to support healthcare professionals in delivering video- and text-based consultations. The available evidence is concentrated on learner-focused outcomes, whereas patient-level, organizational, and long-term outcomes remain underexplored. To our knowledge, this is the first scoping review to synthesize training approaches across both video- and text-based consultation modalities. Future research should prioritize longitudinal evaluation, patient and organizational outcomes, and modality-specific competency development to support sustainable digital healthcare delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.