ArticleFrontiers in urology2026
Efficacy and safety of an implantable tibial neuromodulation system for overactive bladder with urgency urinary incontinence: an open-label, single arm trial.
Article in Frontiers in urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a domestically developed implantable tibial neuromodulation system (iTNS) in the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) in patients with urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). Methods: A prospective single-center open-label trial was conducted. A total of 10 participants underwent iTNS device implantation, followed by device activation at 2-4 weeks post-implantation. Follow-up evaluations were performed at 1, 3, and 6 months post-implantation, including 3-day bladder diaries, validated questionnaires, and symptom satisfaction surveys. The primary endpoint was a ≥50% reduction in UUI episodes per day at 6 months. Results: At 6 months, the iTNS system achieved a 90% response rate (9/10 patients), among whom 40% (4/10) attained ≥3 consecutive dry days. A delayed therapeutic onset was observed: a significant reduction in UUI episodes emerged at 3 months (from 3.235 to 0.766 episodes per day) and 6 months (from 3.235 to 0.632 episodes per day). Quality of life was significantly improved at 6 months, as indicated by the changes in validated questionnaires (OAB-Q: 69.5 ± 11.76 to 44.4 ± 12.06; OABSS: 9 ± 1.155 to 6.2 ± 2.394). Additionally, 80% of patients reported satisfaction with their symptoms at the 6-month endpoint. Conclusions: The domestically developed iTNS system is safe and effective for the treatment of UUI in patients with OAB. It exhibits a strong ability to significantly reduce or completely resolve UUI symptoms, with a favorable safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.