ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Advancing breast cancer diagnosis: a combined approach using deep learning-reconstructed diffusion-weighted imaging and Synthetic MRI.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is the most common cause of malignancy in women, excluding skin cancer, leading to increased interest in novel non-invasive imaging techniques that eliminate the need for contrast agents. Objective: This study aims to establish a deep learning-reconstructed diffusion-weighted imaging (DL-DWI) model combined with Synthetic MRI and to evaluate its diagnostic value for breast cancer in this proof of concept study. Methods: A total of 111 patients with pathologically confirmed breast lesions (39 benign, 72 malignant) were enrolled, and all patients underwent DL-DWI and synthetic MRI scans. Quantitative parameters including ADC, DL-ADC, T1, T2 and PD were compared between benign and malignant groups using rank sum tests. ROC curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic efficacy of single and combined models, and DeLong's test was applied for pairwise AUC comparison. Results: Both DL-ADC (AUC = 0.993; 95% CI: 0.955-1.000) and conventional ADC (AUC = 0.990; 95% CI: 0.949-1.000) demonstrated excellent and comparable diagnostic accuracy. The DL-ADC derived from DL-DWI demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.993), comparable to conventional ADC (AUC = 0.990). A model combining Synthetic MRI with DL-DWI yielded an AUC of 0.995. However, DeLong's test revealed no statistically significant differences in AUC between any pair of models (all p > 0.05): Synthetic MRI + DL-DWI vs. DL-DWI alone (p=0.45), Synthetic MRI + DL-DWI vs. DWI alone (p=0.54), and DL-DWI vs. DWI alone (p=0.67). Conclusion: In this proof of concept study, standalone DL-DWI achieves high accuracy in differentiating benign and malignant in breast lesions meeting the study size criteria. Adding synthetic MRI brings no significant diagnostic improvement, indicating DL-ADC is the dominant diagnostic biomarker. This contrast-free deep learning-based MRI approach has potential as a contrast free protocol and should be further evaluated in a larger clinical trial comparing contrast-enhanced breast MRI with this novel technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.