Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42528650›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026

Assessing the relation between fatigue and depression in multiples sclerosis: the impact of measurement choice.

Tino Zaehle, Stefanie Linnhoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tino ZaehleInstitute for Medical Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Stefanie LinnhoffInstitute for Medical Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fatigue and depression are among the most prevalent and disabling symptoms in multiple sclerosis (MS) and are frequently reported to be strongly associated. This association is often interpreted as reflecting shared pathophysiology. However, widely used depression scales such as the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) include somatic items that overlap with core features of MS and MS-related fatigue, potentially inflating observed relationships. Objectives: To examine whether the association between depression and fatigue in MS depends on the choice of depression measure, we compared the BDI-II with the Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS), a subscale designed to minimize somatic confounding. Methods: In a cohort of 86 people with MS, self-reported fatigue (MFIS, WEIMuS) and depressive symptoms (BDI-II, BDI-FS) were assessed. Fatigue scores were standardized to allow comparability across instruments. Pearson correlations were computed to quantify associations between depression and fatigue, and dependent correlations were compared. Results: Depressive symptoms assessed with the BDI-II showed strong positive correlations with fatigue ( Conclusions: The strength of the association between depression and fatigue in MS depends substantially on the depression measure used. The commonly reported strong relationship appears to be inflated by somatic item overlap in traditional depression scales. The BDI-FS provides a more specific assessment of depressive symptoms and may improve diagnostic accuracy and the interpretation of symptom relationships in MS.

Indexed as

DepressionFatigueMultiple SclerosisAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesBDI-FSBDI-IIdepressionfatiguemultiple sclerosis (MS)

Identifiers

PMID42528650
PMCPMC13414971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.