ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
An
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Rib fractures result in significant morbidity and mortality of equine neonates. Various methods to repair these fractures have been described but biomechanical testing in immature equine neonatal bone has not been performed. The study objective was to compare strength, stiffness, and mode of failure for four different methods of equine neonatal rib fracture repair. Methods: Ribs were randomly allocated to one of four repair groups: nylon cable tie (NCT), modified reconstruction plate (MRP), string of pearls plate (SOP), or rib clip (RC). Ribs were fractured under three-point bending to induce a simple, transverse fracture. The fracture was reduced and repaired according to the assigned repair group, then tested to failure under single-cycle four-point bending. Strength (maximum force, F Results: In intact ribs, no significant differences in F Conclusion: Rigid fixation with MRP or SOP provides stronger fracture repair than NCT or RC when equine neonatal ribs are tested under single-cycle load to failure. Further investigation of both rigid and non-rigid repair methods with cyclic loading is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.