ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Are CNV Risk Scores Linked to Neurodevelopmental and Mental Health Characteristics Within CNV-Associated Intellectual Disability?
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Children and young people (CYP) with intellectual disability (ID) frequently have co-occurring neurodevelopmental (ND) and mental health (MH) difficulties. While copy number variants (CNVs) are identified as an important aetiology of ID, it is unclear whether and how CNV risk scores predict ND and MH characteristics within the CNV-associated ID population. Methods: We analysed data from the UK-based IMAGINE-ID cohort of CYP (aged 4-19 years) with ID and clinically-reported CNVs (N = 1,640). CNVs were annotated with Gencode 19 in ENSEMBL to calculate CNV risk scores, including summed probability of loss-of-function intolerance (pLI) and dosage sensitivity. Multivariate regression models examined the prediction of CNV variables and inheritance on ND and MH characteristics, assessed via the Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA). Post-hoc analyses explored CNV variable stratification (lower vs. higher range pLI). Results: Higher summed pLI scores (indexing CNV genes' intolerance to loss of function) unexpectedly predicted fewer MH difficulties and a lower likelihood of ND diagnoses, even after accounting for demographic factors and CNV inheritance. Post-hoc analyses identified a threshold effect. Within the lower pLI range, higher pLI scores were associated with greater MH difficulties, consistent with findings from population-based samples. In contrast, within the higher pLI range, higher pLI scores were associated with fewer MH difficulties (among individuals more likely to have severe ID). Conclusion: These findings challenge the assumption that CNV genomic "risk scores" universally predict ND and MH difficulties. Instead, within CNV-associated ID, complex relationships exist between CNV risk scores, inheritance and phenotypes. These insights emphasise the necessity of integrating genomic results with familial and developmental context to understand individual vulnerabilities and support needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.