ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Time affluence and health: a scoping review of conceptual and methodological patterns.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review systematically maps how the conceptualization of time affluence, its measurement, and its links to health and wellbeing across existing literature. Drawing on conceptual and theoretical papers, direct empirical investigations, and proxy-based empirical studies, this review identifies substantial variations in conceptual definitions and measurement approaches. The evidence generally frames time affluence as a subjective psychological resource that is associated with psychosocial wellbeing, although structurally oriented studies examine temporal availability using proxy indicators. Across study types, research has primarily focused on psychological outcomes, paying only limited attention to behavioral, physiological, and population-level indicators of health. This review highlights the need for greater conceptual integration between subjective and structural perspectives, methodological diversification going beyond cross-sectional self-report designs, and broader public health investigation of temporal resources as potential determinants for health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.