ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Detectability and healthcare implications of generative AI-synthesized chest radiographs: a blinded radiologist reader study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly explored for medical image synthesis, medical education, and dataset augmentation; however, the detectability and reader-perceived visual authenticity of synthetic chest radiographs generated by accessible multimodal models remain insufficiently understood. This study evaluated synthetic disease-specific chest radiographs generated by gpt-image-2 and gemini-3-pro-image-preview, hereafter referred to as the GPT-image model and the Gemini-image model, respectively, using two generation strategies: text-only generation and image-conditioned generation based on age- and sex-matched normal conditioning radiographs. We included 320 real disease-positive frontal chest radiographs covering cardiomegaly, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, and pneumonia, together with 320 matched normal conditioning radiographs. Synthetic and real disease-positive radiographs were randomized and independently assessed by four radiologists in a blinded single-image reader study, followed by paired evaluation of previously undetected image-conditioned synthetic radiographs. Image-level similarity was assessed using the structural similarity index measure (SSIM), learned perceptual image patch similarity (LPIPS), and Fréchet Inception Distance (FID). Image-conditioned generation had significantly lower AI detection rates than text-only generation (34.0% vs. 56.1%) and consistently lower FID values. Synthetic radiographs generated by the GPT-image model were less frequently detected than those generated by the Gemini-image model and showed higher image-level structural and perceptual similarity to the conditioning radiographs. Paired comparison improved detection of previously undetected image-conditioned synthetic radiographs. These findings indicate that image-conditioned GenAI can produce synthetic chest radiographs that may appear visually authentic to radiologists, highlighting the need for transparent labeling, provenance tracking, expert review, and controlled integration of synthetic medical images into healthcare, education, and research workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.