ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Hidden Burden of a Measles Outbreak Revealed by Genomic and Transmission Models.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Declining childhood vaccination rates have fueled a resurgence of measles in the United States. Surveillance systems may not accurately measure the true extent of outbreaks. As of May 2026, the largest ongoing measles outbreak in the United States originated along the Utah-Arizona border in a community with high vaccine exemption rates and limited engagement with healthcare systems, leading to incomplete testing and reporting. To quantify the true outbreak size, we used two independent approaches with complementary data sources: a phylodynamic analysis and an agent-based model. Both methods found significant underreporting, estimating the true outbreak size to be 3.1- to 4.8-fold larger than reported, with confirmed cases representing only 20.96%-32.5% total infections. These findings suggest that substantial underreporting of measles occurs, especially in tight knit communities. The use of complementary analytical approaches to evaluate completeness of reporting can reveal the extent of measles transmission and aid control efforts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.