ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026
Diversity in energy transition: a multi-case study on DIY solar energy in Germany.
Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The transition to renewable energy systems is not only a technological challenge but also a deeply social and cultural process with significant implications for intersectional equality. Citizen-led energy initiatives are often portrayed as ideal spaces for participatory engagement, yet they can reproduce exclusionary dynamics, particularly regarding gender-related injustices. With a particular focus on FLINTA*-persons this study examines how citizen-led, Do-It-Yourself (DIY) photovoltaic (PV) initiatives in Germany translate normative commitments to diversity and justice into everyday organizational practices. Using a comparative qualitative case study approach, six initiatives were analysed through document-analysis, interviews, and participant observations to explore reflexive orientations-how actors understand gender, diversity, and justice-and performative practices-how these orientations are enacted through strategies, activities, and organizational forms. Findings reveal persistent gaps between diversity aspirations and implementation, shaped by limited resources, organizational constraints, and socio-cultural barriers. Patriarchal norms continue to limit FLINTA*'s participation, even in initiatives explicitly committed to inclusivity, while masculinities within these initiatives often reproduce subtle exclusionary practices. To capture these dynamics, we introduce the concept of ecological-hegemonic masculinity, describing configurations in which men, despite valuing renewable energy, social benefits, and care-oriented narratives, continue to align with hegemonic norms of autonomy, control, and guidance. Furthermore, the study contributes a novel perspective linking reflexive and performative approaches to inclusion and highlights conditions under which diversity efforts succeed or falter. From a practical standpoint, creating protected spaces for FLINTA* and other marginalized groups, alongside sustained financial and institutional support, is essential for moving inclusion from individual motivation to structurally embedded practice. These insights advance both theoretical understanding and actionable strategies for achieving socially just energy transitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.