ArticleClinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology2026
A Claims Data-Based Comparison of Treatment Continuation between Aripiprazole Once-monthly and Paliperidone Palmitate in Routine Practice.
Article in Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Aripiprazole once-monthly (AOM) and paliperidone palmitate once-monthly (PP1M) are commonly used long-acting injectable APs (LAIs) in routine practice. However, their distinct pharmacological properties may differentially influence on long-term treatment continuation. To date, comparison data on long-term treatment continuation between AOM and PP1M are limited. Methods: Patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders identified from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service claims database were followed for 12 months after initiating AOM or PP1M. Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess discontinuation risk and rates. Results: There were significant differences in the discontinuation risk and rates at 6 months (HR = 1.301, 95% CI = 1.242-1.363 and 45.5% vs. 56.2%, respectively) and 12 months (HR = 1.322, 95% CI = 1.270-1.376 and 62.7% vs. 74.1%, respectively) between the two LAIs, where the patients treated with AOM showed lower discontinuation rates than those treated with PP1M. The all-cause hospitalization rates (52.3% vs 60.4%; 53.7% vs 61.6%) and newly developed extrapyramidal symptoms (6.2% vs 7.0%; 7.7% vs. 8.1%) at 6 months and 12 months were numerically lower in AOM than in PP1M, respectively. These findings were consistent in PSM and 3-month landmark analysis. Conclusion: In this nationwide real-world study, AOM was associated with a lower risk of treatment discontinuation than PP1M over 12 months. These findings suggest differences in treatment continuation between the two LAIs and warrant confirmation in studies using more robust designs and diverse clinical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.