ReviewClinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology2026
Comparative Efficacy of Interventions for the Prevention and Treatment of Postpartum Depression: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.
Review in Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postpartum depression (PPD) is a highly prevalent but under-reported and undertreated disorder that affects mothers and infants alike. The management of PPD has to be thoughtfully catered to limit the exposure of infants to harmful drugs. This network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to assess the efficacy of pharmacological interventions for the prevention and treatment of PPD. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane databases and clinical trial registries to find studies to be included, and data were extracted. Random effects Bayesian NMA was performed using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations. A network graph was built, the rank probability of each treatment was determined, and the surface under the cumulative rank probability curve was calculated. The risk of bias assessment, including publication bias, was assessed. Data from 54 studies, including 7,438 participants, were included for this NMA. No pharmacological intervention demonstrated robust superiority over placebo for the treatment of PPD, though wide credible intervals (CrI) and limited sample sizes preclude definitive conclusions. Trazodone (-1.6; 95% CrI: -2.7 to -0.41) and diphenhydramine (-1.4; 95% CrI: -2.5 to -0.20) are the two treatments that showed an efficacy superior to placebo in the prevention of PPD as seen by symptom severity scores. There was no publication bias, as observed by the funnel plot and Egger's regression test. Based on single small trials, trazodone and diphenhydramine showed statistically superior efficacy to placebo in preventing PPD. Safety considerations in the perinatal and breastfeeding context must be carefully evaluated before these agents are considered in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.