Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42528291›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2026

Factors That Influence Genetic Counselors' Professional Identity-A Qualitative Study.

Lisa Schwartz, Kaye Stenberg, Andrea Casey, Jennifer Fitzpatrick, Mia S Mackall, McKinsey L Goodenberger, Aishwarya Arjunan, Sarah Witherington, Isha Kalia, Rachel Mills

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lisa SchwartzDepartment of Biomedical Laboratory Sciences, The George Washington University, Ashburn, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4981-4948
Kaye StenbergSchool of Health Professions, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3965-1973
Andrea CaseyDepartment of Human and Organizational Learning, The George Washington University, Ashburn, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3668-5829
Jennifer FitzpatrickDepartment of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8714-6164
Mia S MackallNatera Inc, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1826-6299
McKinsey L GoodenbergerDepartment of Lab Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9560-6344
Aishwarya ArjunanDepartment of Medical Affairs, GRAIL LLC, Menlo Park, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7863-2388
Sarah WitheringtonQuest Diagnostics Inc, Secaucus, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0859-4061
Isha KaliaOtogenetics Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7945-3886
Rachel MillsMS Genetic Counseling Program, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4420-9503

Funding

National Society of Genetic Counselors
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic counselors describe their professional identity as who they are (personal characteristics and attributes), what they do (actions and skills), and what they possess (training and knowledge). A shared multidimensional perspective highlights the transferability of their skills across diverse roles and settings. This qualitative study aimed to identify factors that influence genetic counselors' perceptions and formation of their professional identities. Using Social Identity Theory as a theoretical framework, semi-structured recorded interviews were conducted with 50 genetic counselors who were purposefully sampled to ensure diversity of personal demographics (gender, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability, and caregiver status), as well as years, settings, and roles in genetic counseling practice. Transcripts were coded and subjected to codebook thematic analysis using NVivo. Professional identity was influenced by internal validation (sense of purpose in work, pride, and confidence), external validation (from other colleagues, work system, degree of autonomy, and patients), one's personal identities (demographics, life experiences, and persona), and connections with others (professional network, peer support, role models, and giving back). Alignment and misalignment of these factors and the perceived collective identity of the profession impacted genetic counselors' sense of belonging to the profession both positively and negatively, respectively. Continued efforts to diversify the profession, as well as expanded opportunities for genetic counselors to work in new settings and roles, require critical reflection and discussion about the collective identity of the genetic counseling profession. The findings of this study can inform the recruitment, training, credentialing, continuing education, and retention of genetic counselors to ensure that genetic counselors, regardless of their personal identities or their work roles or settings, develop and maintain a sense of belonging and commitment to the profession and its values. In turn, the support of professional identity formation can positively impact genetic counselors' job satisfaction, competency, and delivery of healthcare to their patients and the populations they serve.

Indexed as

CounselorsGenetic CounselingSocial IdentificationAdultFemaleHumansMaleQualitative Researchbelongingburnoutdiversitygenetic counselorsinclusionprofessional identityqualitative researchworkforce

Identifiers

PMID42528291
PMCPMC13420764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.