ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2026
Comparison of the effects of four commercially available prescription diet regimens on the fecal microbiome in healthy cats.
Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diet significantly influences the gut microbiota, with variations in macronutrient content (proteins, fats, and carbohydrates) and the presence of non-digestible carbohydrates, such as fiber, playing crucial roles in shaping microbial composition. This study investigated the effects of four commercial prescription diets (low-carbohydrate, weight-loss, high soluble fiber, and renal) on the fecal microbiome of five healthy domestic cats using a 4 × 4 Latin square design. Fecal samples were analyzed using Illumina sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene to assess bacterial community structure and diversity. Results showed that cats fed the renal diet (low protein, high carbohydrate, high fat) were associated with higher relative abundances of the class Actinobacteria, particularly Bifidobacterium. The low-carbohydrate diet was associated with higher relative abundances of Adlercreutzia, Collinsella, and Slackia. The high-soluble fiber diet was associated with a higher relative proportion of Streptococcaceae. In contrast, the renal diet was associated with lower relative abundances of Blautia and Erysipelotrichales. No significant differences were observed in alpha-diversity indices among diets, whereas beta-diversity analysis showed significant differences in microbial community composition among dietary groups. These findings suggest that dietary composition may influence the fecal microbiome in healthy cats. However, given the exploratory design and compositional nature of the sequencing data, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and considered hypothesis-generating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.