ArticleEnvironmental health and preventive medicine2026
Parent and child experiences of research participation and retention intentions in a Japanese birth cohort: insights from the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS).
Article in Environmental health and preventive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong-term birth cohort studies depend on sustained participant engagement. In such studies, children are not only observed over time but also increasingly become participants who experience, interpret, and evaluate their own involvement in research. However, research on continued participation has focused mainly on parental perspectives, with limited attention to children's own views or to similarities and differences between parents and children. Against the growing recognition that people in medical research should be understood as participants rather than passive subjects, this study examined research participation experiences and retention intentions in both parents and children within a Japanese birth cohort.
methodsWe conducted a questionnaire survey from September to October 2024 within the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS). The primary outcome was retention intention. Factors associated with retention intention were analyzed separately for parents and children using ordinal logistic regression. Parent-child concordance in retention intention was assessed descriptively using weighted Cohen's kappa.
resultsAmong 1,008 eligible parents of fifth-grade children, 485 responded (response rate, 44%). A large majority of parents (92%) and children (79%) reported willingness to continue participation. Parent-child responses showed moderate agreement (κ = 0.46). In separate adjusted ordinal logistic regression models, stronger parental retention intention was associated with lower perceived questionnaire burden (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 5.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.40-9.17), fewer concerns about possible disagreement with their child (aOR: 5.75, 95% CI: 3.51-9.42), and less difficulty scheduling study activities (aOR: 5.80, 95% CI: 3.50-9.63). In children, stronger retention intention was associated with anticipated gifts (aOR: 7.38, 95% CI: 2.93-18.56), talking with friends about the study (aOR: 6.02, 95% CI: 2.25-16.09), and a desire for peer interaction (aOR: 6.72, 95% CI: 3.39-13.29).
conclusionsParents and children both showed generally positive retention intentions, but disagreement was not negligible. Their retention intentions were associated with different participation-related experiences, suggesting that long-term birth cohort studies should attend to participants' perspectives in age-specific ways. Understanding research participation through both parental and child experiences may help inform more participant-centered engagement strategies and support the quality of long-term cohort research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.