SynthesisMicrosurgery2026
The Evolution of Phalloplasty for Masculinizing Gender Affirming Surgery: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques and Complications Over the Past 25 Years.
Synthesis in Microsurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesGender affirming phalloplasty is aimed at reducing the deleterious effects of gender dysphoria in the trans male population. Despite being first described in 1945, there is no gold standard for gender affirming phalloplasty. Our objective is to systematically review the phalloplasty literature regarding surgical technique, complication profiles, and temporal trends to understand the evolution of phalloplasty. MATERIALS AND
methodsA literature review was conducted using the electronic databases PubMed and Medline separately, Scopus, and Embase. Studies were included if they were original research studies published in English between January 2000 and September 2025, with more than three enrolled patients and gender affirmation as the indication for phalloplasty. Studies were split into two groups based on the year of publication (Group 1: 2000-2010; Group 2: 2011-2025) to allow comparison between older and more recent studies.
resultsForty-five articles were deemed suitable after the literature search and screening. Overall, there were 2586 patients. 65.3% had a radial forearm free flap phalloplasty. The tube-in-a-tube technique was the preferred method of neourethral reconstruction, with 85.8% in Group 1 and 64.4% in Group 2 (p < 0.01). Group 2 demonstrated a significant increase in the use of pedicled flaps (p < 0.01) and the use of radial forearm free flap urethroplasty alone (p < 0.01). Group 2 showed an increase in sensory reconstruction (p < 0.01). Complication rates were high at 0.74 and 0.66 complications per patient in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Urinary complications were also high; urethral fistulas in 25.7% and 36.6% of patients, and urethral strictures in 16.1% and 12.8% of patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Outcomes such as urinary function, tactile sensation, erogenous sensation, and cosmesis were poorly reported.
conclusionsThis systematic review, to our knowledge, is the first to analyze the evolution of phalloplasty over time, suggesting a shift from traditional free-flap techniques toward more diverse reconstructive approaches, including pedicled and perforator-based options. However, inconsistent outcome reporting limits meaningful comparison between techniques. Standardized, high-quality evidence is required to guide optimal surgical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.